Editorial Standards
At Mealfeelingscore, we are committed to publishing accurate, evidence-based content about eating and emotional wellbeing. Our editorial standards reflect our dedication to integrity, transparency, and reader trust.
Every article is researched, reviewed, and published with care to serve our community with the information they deserve.
Our Editorial Principles
These principles guide every piece of content we publish and ensure our readers receive reliable, well-researched information.
Evidence-Based Content
We ground our articles in current research, peer-reviewed studies, and expert knowledge. Every claim is supported by credible sources. We distinguish between established science and emerging research, helping readers understand the strength of evidence behind each topic. When we explore new areas, we clearly label them as emerging or exploratory.
Independence & Transparency
Our editorial decisions are made independently by our team, free from commercial pressure. We disclose any partnerships, sponsorships, or potential conflicts of interest. Readers deserve to know the full context of what they're reading. We maintain clear separation between editorial content and any promotional material.
Balanced & Nuanced
We acknowledge complexity and avoid oversimplification. Food and emotion are deeply personal; what works for one person may not work for another. We present multiple perspectives, highlight exceptions, and resist the urge to claim universal solutions. We help readers think critically rather than prescribe one correct way.
Reader-Centred Approach
Our content is written for real people with real questions. We prioritise clarity over jargon, use plain language, and always explain technical terms. We listen to reader feedback and update articles when new information emerges. Our goal is to empower, inform, and support—never to alarm or shame.
Accurate Attribution
We credit original sources, cite research properly, and link to studies where possible. We acknowledge when we've adapted ideas from other writers. We name expert contributors and make their credentials clear. Good attribution is both an ethical duty and a way to deepen reader knowledge by pointing toward further resources.
Living Documents
Our articles evolve as science advances and as we receive feedback. We update content regularly to reflect new findings and to correct outdated information. When we make significant changes, we note the update date prominently so readers know when information was last reviewed and refreshed.
Our Fact-Checking Process
Research & Source Review
Our writers begin by gathering sources from peer-reviewed journals, reputable health organisations, and expert interviews. We prioritise recent research and primary sources over secondary summaries.
Expert Review
Before publication, articles are reviewed by nutrition professionals and content specialists who check facts, identify gaps, and ensure claims are properly supported by evidence.
Editorial Verification
Our editorial team verifies every statement against original sources, checks quotes for accuracy, and confirms all links and references are current and correct before the article goes live.
Ongoing Monitoring
After publication, we monitor articles for reader feedback, emerging contradicting research, and link integrity. If problems are found, we update or correct the article promptly.
What We Look For
- Sample size & study design: We assess whether research is robust or preliminary.
- Author expertise: We confirm contributors have relevant credentials and experience.
- Publication date: We prioritise recent research while noting when older studies remain relevant.
- Conflicts of interest: We note if research was funded by food or supplement companies.
- Context & nuance: We check that claims aren't overstated or taken out of context.
- Consistency: We verify that new information aligns with established science or clearly explains why it differs.
Our Editorial Leadership
Our team brings diverse expertise in nutrition, psychology, editorial practice, and reader engagement. We believe good content comes from thoughtful collaboration.
Sarah Mitchell
Editor-in-Chief
Sarah leads our editorial vision and oversees all content strategy. With 12 years in food and lifestyle journalism, she brings rigorous standards to every article published.
James Chen
Science & Research Lead
James holds a PhD in nutritional science and manages our fact-checking process. He ensures every claim is grounded in solid evidence and properly contextualised for readers.
Emma Roberts
Wellness & Psychology Editor
Emma specialises in the psychology of eating and emotional wellbeing. She brings a human-centred perspective to our coverage and bridges nutrition science with lived experience.
Marcus Thompson
Community & Feedback
Marcus manages reader feedback and community engagement. He ensures that questions and corrections flow back to our team so we can improve and stay accountable to our audience.
Corrections & Updates
How We Handle Errors
We take accuracy seriously. If you spot a factual error, unclear statement, or outdated information, please let us know. We welcome constructive feedback and act quickly to correct mistakes.
Factual Errors
We correct factual mistakes immediately, note the correction in the article, and document what was changed.
Outdated Information
When new research contradicts or updates previous information, we revise the article and add an "Updated" note with the date.
Unclear Language
If readers report confusion about an explanation, we rewrite for clarity and note the revision in the article.
Attribution Issues
We correct any missing or incorrect source citations and ensure proper credit is given to original authors.
Found an issue? Contact our editorial team at [email protected] with the article title, specific claim, and why you believe it needs correction.
Our Transparency Commitment
We believe transparency builds trust. Every article includes an "Updated" date at the top, showing when the piece was last reviewed. Significant changes are documented so readers understand our editorial process.
Publication & Update Dates
Every article displays both the original publish date and the most recent update date. This helps you assess how current the information is.
Cited Sources
We link directly to studies and sources whenever possible, letting you verify our claims and explore topics deeper yourself.
Author Credentials
Contributors' qualifications and expertise are listed at the end of every article so you know who is writing and why they are qualified.
Change Notes
Major revisions are noted at the top of articles so you know what changed and why, preserving editorial integrity.
What You Can Expect from Us
Honesty about limitations: We clearly state what we know, what we don't, and where science is still evolving.
No false promises: We don't claim that food choices alone can replace professional support or cure complex challenges. We discuss realistic benefits and empower you to make informed choices.
Inclusive perspective: We acknowledge that food preferences, cultural backgrounds, budgets, and access vary widely. Our advice is adapted to different situations.
Responsive to you: Reader questions and corrections help us improve. We listen and evolve our coverage based on community needs.
Ethical independence: We are not sponsored by food companies, supplement makers, or retailers. Our editorial decisions are ours alone.
Questions About Our Standards?
We welcome feedback, corrections, and questions about our editorial process. If you'd like to discuss anything you've read or suggest improvements, we'd love to hear from you.